Study Protocol
Published October 31, 2018
Article Tools
Article Level Metrics
Share this article
facebook twitter linkedin



How to Cite

Dehghan, H. R., Eslami, S., Namayandeh, M., Dehghani, A., Hajian Dashtaki, S., Gholampour, V., Ghasemian, S., Zare, A., Rahimi, M., & Barzegar, A. (2018). Criteria for Ethical Evaluation of Hospital Information Systems: A Protocol for Systematic Review. Internal Medicine and Medical Investigation Journal, 3(4).

Criteria for Ethical Evaluation of Hospital Information Systems: A Protocol for Systematic Review

Hamid Reza Dehghan
MD,MPh Health Technology Assessment Department Health Faculty Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health
Saeed Eslami
Department of Informatics, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
Mahdieh Namayandeh
Arezo Dehghani
Saeed Hajian Dashtaki
Vahid Gholampour
Smanneh Ghasemian
Atefeh Zare
Masomeh Rahimi
Abbas Barzegar

Introduction: The implementation of information technology is an important factor in improving the quality of patient care. Since a hospital is an organization that needs effective management of information, the implementation of information technology is necessary for improving the ef ciency of the services, quality of care, and reducing the costs. Ethical evaluation of hospital information systems is one of the existing gaps in evaluating this technology. Many evaluations have been carried out for information that is more technical and not concerned with ethical issues. Therefore, this study aims to compile a checklist for the evaluation of ethical dimensions of this technology using a systematic review. Methods: We searched international medical databases, such as the U.K. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Cochrane Library; Iranian databases Irandoc, Iranmedex, Medlib, SID, and grayscale websites SInGLE, and Ideas.recp. After selecting the studies based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, two experts in the eld of information technology and ethical evaluation extract ethical issues from the full text of the articles. Results and Dissemination: The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences, which can be used by policy makers and healthcare decision-makers.


European Network For Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA). (2007). HTA de nition, Internet On line ed. http://www.eunethta. net/HTA/.

Battista, R.N. (1996). Towards a paradigm for technology assessment. The scientific basis of health services. London: BMJ Publishing Group 11-18.

Ten Have, H. (2004). Ethical perspectives on health technology assessment.International journal of technology assessment in health care, 20, (1) 71-76.

Clausen, C. & Yoshinaka, Y. (2004). Social shaping of technology in TA and HTA. Poiesis & Praxis: International Journal of Technology Assessment and Ethics of Science, 2, (2) 221-246.

Van der Wilt, G.J., Reuzel, R., & Banta, H.D. (2000).

The ethics of assessing health technologies. Theoretical

Medicine and Bioethics, 21, (1) 101-113.

Oliver, A., Mossialos, E., & Robinson, R. (2004) Health technology assessment and its influence on health-care priority setting. International journal of technology assessment in health care, 20, (01) 1-10.

Heitman, E. (1998). Ethical issues in technology assessment: Conceptual categories and procedural considerations. International journal of technology assessment in health care, 14, (03) 544-566.

Hubner-Bloder G, Ammenwerth E. Key performance indicators to benchmark hospital information systems - a delphi study. Methods Inf Med 2009; 48(6): 508-18.

Tsiknakis M, Katehakis DG, Orphanoudakis SC. An open, component-based information infrastructure for integrated health information networks. Int J Med In- form 2002; 68(1-3): 3-26.

Clifford GD, Blaya JA, Hall-Clifford R, Fraser HS. Medical information systems: a foundation for health-care technologies in developing countries. Biomed Eng Online 2008; 7: 18.

Malik M, Khan H. Understanding the Implementation of an Electronic Hospital Information System in a Developing Country: A Case Study from Pakistan. Proceedings of the ACSC 2009: 32nd Australasian Computer Science Conference; 2009 Jan 19-23; Wellington, New Zealand; 2009.

Ward J, Grif ths PM. Strategic planning for information systems. New York, NY: Wiley; 1996.

Bagayoko CO, Dufour JC, Chaacho S, Bouhaddou O, Fieschi M. Open source challenges for hospital information system (HIS) in developing countries: a pilot project in Mali. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2010; 10: 22.

Hanna Suominena, b, Tuija Lehtikunnasc, e, Barbro Backa, d, Helena Karstena, b, Tapio Salakoskia, b, Sanna Salanteräc. Applying language technology to nursing documents: Pros and cons with a focus on ethics.

Martin C. Were, Eric M. Meslin, Ethics of Implementing Electronic Health Records in Developing Countries: Points to Consider.

I. D. Norman, M. K. Aikins and F. N. Binka. Ethics and Electronic Health Information Technology: Challenges for Evidence-Based Medicine and the Physician–Patient Relationship. Ghana Medical Journal, September 2011 Volume 45, Number 3.

Dean F. Sittig, Hardeep Singh, Legal, Ethical, and Financial Dilemmas in Electronic Health Record Adoption and Use. PEDIATRICS Volume 127, Number 4, April 2011.

Marion Motari*, Martin Okechukwu Ota and Joses Muthuri Kirigia. Readiness of ethics review systems for a changing public health landscape in the WHO African Region. BMC Medical Ethics (2015).

David A. Fleming, Ethics Conflicts in Rural Communities: Health Information Technology, Handbook for Rural Health Care Ethics: A Practical Guide for Professionals.

chapter 14.

Ian Harris, Penny Duquenoy, Richard Jennings, David

Pullinger, Simon Rogerson. Ethical Assessment of New Technologies: A Meta-Methodology. Communication and Ethics in Society, Volume 9, Issue 1, pages 49-64.

Farahnaz Sadoughi, Khalil Kimiafar, Maryam Ahmadi 1, Mohammad Taghi Shakeri. Determining of Factors Influencing the Success and Failure of Hospital In- formation System and Their Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review. Iran Red Cres Med J. 2013 December; 15(12).

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.