Original Articles
Published February 11, 2020
Article Tools
DOI
Article Level Metrics
Share this article
facebook twitter linkedin
PDF

Keywords

Right ventricular systolic function
Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography
Right ventricular myocardial infarction

How to Cite

Sadeghian, H., Soltani, F., Lotfi Tokaldani, M., Jalali, A., & Sadeghian, A. (2020). Right Ventricular Systolic Function by 3D Echocardiography in Patients with Inferior Myocardial Infarction vs. without Right Ventricular Infarction; Compared with Normal Subjects. Internal Medicine and Medical Investigation Journal, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.24200/imminv.v4i3.240

Right Ventricular Systolic Function by 3D Echocardiography in Patients with Inferior Myocardial Infarction vs. without Right Ventricular Infarction; Compared with Normal Subjects: Right Ventricular Systolic Function, 3D Echocardiography, Inferior Myocardial Infarction

Hakimeh Sadeghian
Fereshteh Soltani
Masoumeh Lotfi Tokaldani
Arash Jalali
Afsaneh Sadeghian

Introduction: We aimed to assess the effect of right ventricular myocardial segmental and global function by using conventional two-dimensional echocardiography (2D) and new available echocardiographic techniques including real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE). Materials/Methods: Fifty patients with first inferior wall myocardial infarction (Inf MI) were divided into two groups, including 25 with RVMI and 25 without RVMI. Twenty-five age-matched individuals were included as a control. Right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) with 3DE, Tricuspid Annular Plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), RV fractional shortening area (FSA), strain (S), strain rate (SR), and systolic tissue velocity (S’) of basal and mid segments of RV free wall were measured. Results: By 3DE, RVEF was significantly lower in patients with RVMI than those without RVMI and controls (47±6 % vs. 55±5 % and 58±6 %, respectively, P<0.001). There was also remarkably larger RV end-systolic volume (RVESV) (44±8 ml vs. 31±6 ml, and 30±7 ml, respectively, P<0.001) and end-diastolic volume (RVEDV) (87±8 ml vs. 69±9 ml, and 69±8 ml, respectively, P<0.001) for RVMI group. In the entire population, RVEDV and RVESV by 3DE were correlated positively and significantly with the measurements by 2D (r= 0.80, p<0.001; r=0.84, p<0.001, respectively). There was positive significant correlation between 3DE RVEF and FSA (r=0.78, p<0.001), TAPSE (r=0.81, p<0.001), S, SR and S’ of basal (r=0.70, p<0.001; r=0.75, p<0.001; r=0.68, p<0.001, respectively) segment of RV free wall. Conclusion: RVEF by 3DE was significantly lower in patients with RVMI than those without RVMI and well-correlated with RV FSA, TAPSE, S, SR, and S’ of basal segment of RV free wall.

https://doi.org/10.24200/imminv.v4i3.240
PDF

References

Jurcut R, Giusca S, LaGerche A, Vasile S, Ginghina C, Voigtet JU. The echocardiographic assessment of the right ventricle: What to do in 2010? Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010;11(2):81-96.

Salehi M, Latif M, Peighambari F, Dehestani M, Ahmadi-Hanzaei SV. Correlation Between Body Mass Index and Echocardiographic Findings in Overweight Patients Compared to Normal-Weight Patients. Internal Medicine and Medical Investigation Journal. 2017; 2(3): 102-5. doi: 10.24200/imminv.v2i3.93.

Chin KM, Kim NH, Rubin LJ. The right ventricle in pulmonary hypertension. Coron Artery Dis 2005;16(1):13-18.

Goldstein JA. Acute Right ventricular infarction. Cardiol clin 2012;30:219-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccl.2012.03.002

Zehender M, Kasper W, Kauder E, Schonthaler M, Geibel A, Olschewski M, Just H. Right ventricular infarction as an independent predictor of prognosis after acute inferior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1993; 328:981-988. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199304083281401

Jackobs AK, Leopold JA, Bates E, Mendes LA, Sleeper LA, White H, et al. Cardiogenic shock caused by right ventricular infarction: a report from the SHOCK registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41(8):1273-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00120-7.

Goldstein JA. State of the art review: pathophysiology and management of right heart ischemia. J Am Col Cardiol. 2002;40:841-853.

Kinch JM, Ryan TJ. Right ventricular infarction. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:1211-1217.

KakourosN, Cokkinos DV. Right ventricular myocardial infarction: Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Postgrad Med J. 2010;86(1022):719-28. https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.2010.103887

Braat SH, Brugada P, Dezwaan C, Coenegracht JM, Wellens HJ. Value of echocardiogram in diagnosing right ventricular involvement in patients with acute inferior wall myocardial infarction. Br Heart J 1983;49:368-372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/hrt.49.4.368

Klein HO, Tordijmam T, Ninio R, Sareli P, Oren V, Lang R, et al. The early recognition of right ventricular infarction: diagnostic accuracy of the electrocardiographic V4R Lead. Circulation 1983;67(3):558-565.

Wiedman F, Eyskens B, Jamal F, Mertens L, Kowalski M, D’Hooge J, et al. Quantification of regional left and right ventricular radial and longitudinal function in healthy children using ultrasound-based strain rate and strain imaging. J Am Soc Echocardioger. 2002;15(1);20-28.

Weidemann F, Eyskens B, Mertens L, Salvo JD, Strotmann J, Buyse G, et al. Quantification of regional right and left ventricular function by ultrasonic strain rate and strain indexes in friedreich’s ataxia. Am J cardiol. 2003;91(5):622-626.

Kjaergaard J, Sogaard P, Hassager C. Right ventricular strain in pulmonary embolism by Doppler tissue echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2004;17(11):1210-1212.

LaGerche A, Jurcut R, Voigt Ju. Right ventricular function by strain echocardiography. Curr opin cardiol 2010;25(5):430-436.

Tamborini G, Brusoni D, Torres Molina JE, Galli CA, Maltagliati A, Murator M, et al. Feasibility of a new generation three-dimentional echocardiography for right ventricular volumetric and functional measurements. Am J Cardiol 2008;102(4):499-505.

Van der zwaan HB, Helbing WA, McGhie JS, McGhie GS, Geleijnse ML, Luijnenburg SE, et al. Clinical value of real-time three-dimentionalchocardiography for right ventricle quantification in congenital heart disease: validation with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010;23(2):134-140.

Leibundgut G, Rohner A, Grize L, Bernheim A, Kessel-Schaefer A, Bremerich J, et al. Dynamic assessment of right ventricle volumes and function by real-time three-dimentional echocardiography: a comparison study with magnetic resonance imaging in 100 adult patients. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23(2):116-126.

Lindqvist P, Waldenstorm A, Henein M, Mörner S, Kazzam E.Regional and global right ventricular function in healthy individuals aged 20-90 years: A pulse Doppler tissue imaging study. Echocardiography 2005;22(4):305-314.

Aune E, Baekkevar M, Rodevand O, Otterstad JE. The limited usefulness of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography in obtaining normal reference ranges for right ventricle volumes. Cardiovascular ultrasound 2009;7:35. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-7-35

Sevimli S, Gundogdu F, Aksakal E, Arslan S, Tas H, Islamogluet Y, et al. Right ventricle strain and strain rate properties in patients with right ventricular myocardial infarction. Echocardiography 2007;24(7):732-738.

Gopal As, Chukwu EO, Iwuchukwu CJ, Katz AS, Toole RS, Schapiro W. et al. Normal values of right ventricle size and Function by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: Comparison with cardiac resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007;20(5):445- 455.

Maceira AM, Prasad SK, Khan M, Pennell DJ. Reference right ventricle systolic and diastolic function normalized to age, gender and body surface area from steady-state free precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur Heart J 2006; 27(23):2879- 2888.

Dutta T, Aronow WS. Echocardiographic evaluation of the right ventricle: Clinical implications. Clinical Cardiology 2017;40(3):542-548.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.