Relationship Between Shock Index and Clinical Outcome in Patients with Multiple Traumas
Background: Initial assessment of hemodynamic parameters and timely management of patients regarding hypovolemic shock occurrence is the most essential clinical action in trauma patients and shock index (SI) has considerable accuracy associated with wide application. Therefore, this study is planned to evaluate the relationship of the shock index and clinical outcome in patients with multiple trauma referring to Shahid Sadoughi Hospital of Yazd in 2011.
Methods: The present study was a descriptive cross-sectional study carried out on 334 patients with multiple trauma referring to Emergency Center of Shahid Sadoughi Hospital of Yazd in 2011. Patients were divided into two separate groups based on Shock index score (≥ 0.9 as abnormal SI and < 0.9 as normal SI).Finally, data were analyzed using Chi-square and independent sample t-test in SPSS ver.19.
Results: There was significant difference between the two groups in terms of mean of and gender distribution (P= 0.001). There was also a significant difference between patients with head and neck trauma and pelvic injuries in terms of frequency distribution (P< 0.05). Hemodynamic parameters were also significantly different in the two studied groups (P< 0.001). Also, with regard to the frequency distribution of intensive care unit admission (ICU) and mortality rate, there was significant difference in the two groups.
Conclusion: Shock index has considerable predictive value in patients with multiple trauma and can be used in initial management and assessment of patients with multiple trauma before any other diagnostic procedures since it is easily calculated. Shock index can also rapidly diagnose the real condition of trauma patient in primary hours and prevent secondary unpleasant clinical outcomes.
Evans JA, van Wessem KJ, McDougall D, Lee KA, Lyons T, Balogh ZJ. Epidemiology of traumatic deaths: comprehensive population-based assessment. World J Surg 2010; 34(1): 158-63.
Anderson ID, Woodford M, De Dombal FT, Irving M. Retrospective study of 1000 deaths from injury in England and Wales. Br Med J 1988; 296(6632): 1305-8.
Birkhahn RH, Gaeta TJ, Terry D, Bove JJ, Tloczkowski J. Shock index in diagnosing early acute hypovolemia. Am J Emerg Med 2005; 23(3): 323-6.
Rady MY, Smithline HA, Blake H, Nowak R, Rivers E. A comparison of the shock index and conventional vital signs to identify acute, critical illness in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 1994; 24(4): 685-90.
Mutschler M, Nienaber U, Brockamp T, Wafaisade A, Wyen H, Peiniger S, et al. A critical reappraisal of the ATLS classification of hypovolaemic shock: does it really reflect clinical reality? Resuscitation 2013; 84(3): 309-13.
Guly HR, Bouamra O, Little R, Dark P, Coats T, Driscoll P, et al. Testing the validity of the ATLS classification of hypovolaemic shock. Resuscitation 2010; 81(9): 1142-7.
Guly HR, Bouamra O, Spiers M, Dark P, Coats T, Lecky FE. Vital signs and estimated blood loss in patients with major trauma: testing the validity of the ATLS classification of hypovolaemic shock. Resuscitation 2011; 82(5): 556-9.
Allgower M, Buri C. Shock index. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1967; 46: 1-10.
Allgower M, Burri C. Shock-index. Ger Med Mon 1968; 13(1): 14-9.
American College of Surgeons. ATLS, Advanced Trauma Life Support for Doctors. 8th ed. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2008.
King RW, Plewa MC, Buderer NM, Knotts FB. Shock index as a marker for significant injury in trauma patients. Acad Emerg Med 1996; 3(11): 1041-5.
Cannon CM, Braxton CC, Kling-Smith M, Mahnken JD, Carlton E, Moncure M. Utility of the shock index in predicting mortality in traumatically injured patients. J Trauma 2009; 67(6): 1426-30.
Zarzaur BL, Croce MA, Fischer PE, Magnotti LJ, Fabian TC. New vitals after injury: shock index for the young and age x shock index for the old. J Surg Res 2008; 147(2): 229-36.
Nakasone Y, Ikeda O, Yamashita Y, Kudoh K, Shigematsu Y, Harada K. Shock index correlates with extravasation on angiographs of gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a logistics regression analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2007; 30(5): 861-5.
Rady MY, Nightingale P, Little RA, Edwards JD. Shock index: a re-evaluation in acute circulatory failure. Resuscitation 1992; 23(3): 227-34.
Rady MY, Rivers EP, Martin GB, Smithline H, Appelton T, Nowak RM. Continuous central venous oximetry and shock index in the emergency department: use in the evaluation of clinical shock. Am J Emerg Med 1992; 10(6): 538-41.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.